22130713_covr
Rss

Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy

About this journal  

Subscribe to the email alerts for this journal here to receive notifications when a new issue is at your disposal.

Issue 1, 2022 Expand all abstracts
Editorial

Access_open The Limits of Law and the Courage to Act

An Irreverent Call to Arendtian Action in the Face of War

Authors Laura Henderson
Author's information

Laura Henderson
Laura Henderson is assistant professor of International law and Human Rights at Utrecht University.
Editorial

Access_open The Radical Aspirations of Justifying Contract in Europe

Keywords European Contract Law, Normative Theory, Political Philosophy, Contract Law Theory, Justification
Authors Mirthe Jiwa and Lyn K.L. Tjon Soei Len
Author's information

Mirthe Jiwa
Mirthe Jiwa is lecturer of Private Law at the Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam and PhD candidate at the Amsterdam Centre of Transformative Private Law, University of Amsterdam.

Lyn K.L. Tjon Soei Len
Lyn K.L. Tjon Soei Len is assistant professor at the Ohio State University.
Article

Access_open How Radical is the Understanding of Democracy in Justifying Contract in Europe?

Keywords separation of powers, radical democracy, antagonism, dissensus, discourse theory
Authors Christina Eckes
AbstractAuthor's information

    Justifying Contract in Europe answers on every page the ‘so what’-question of why one should care about European contract law. I thoroughly enjoyed reading the engaging analysis of the normative foundations of law through the lens of six strands of political theory: utilitarianism; liberal-egalitarianism; libertarianism; communitarianism; civic republicanism; and discourse theory. In this short reflection, I will concentrate on one specific question, which seem, however, relevant to the entire inquiry of the book: Does Justifying Contract in Europe honor its expressly stated commitment to radical democracy? How does it deal, in light of the growing dissensus in Europe, with the need to provide institutional arrangements that equip a political system to turn unproductive antagonism into productive agonism?


Christina Eckes
Christina Eckes is professor of European Law at the University of Amsterdam.
Article

Access_open Pluralism as Inability to Choose

Celebrating the Normative Diversity of EU Contract Law

Keywords pluralism, deliberation, normative justifications, EU law, reconciliation
Authors Giacomo Tagiuri
AbstractAuthor's information

    In this article I locate Justifying Contract in Europe’s most unique contribution in its rhetorical and methodological commitment to pluralism, which, although Hesselink may disagree, is also a normative and political commitment. Starting from this observation, I then discuss the normative implications of this type of pluralism for the ways in which different reasons are reconciled and reflected in the law. As I argue, it may not be necessary, desirable, or even possible to choose the precise reasons why we support a certain normative answer – say consumer protection is desirable – nor to discard all concerns coming from those supporting the opposite answer – no consumer protection. This implies that ‘reconciliation’ describes better than ‘compromise’ what we need to shape contract law in Europe. In the conclusions, I reflect on what this may mean for the EU and EU Law. As I suggest, the type of pluralism the book evokes and celebrates, if not explicitly theorizes, offers a powerful rejection of accounts that see EU law as dominated by a narrow set of values and normative commitments.


Giacomo Tagiuri
Giacomo Tagiuri is assistant professor in EU Law at the University of Amsterdam.
Article

Access_open Justifying Racial and Gendered Contract in Europe

Keywords feminist theory, contract law, intersectionality, gender, race
Authors Lyn K.L. Tjon Soei Len
AbstractAuthor's information

    Justifying Contract in Europe has the ambition to contribute to the envisioning of more just alternative futures by highlighting the normative stakes of contract law questions. This contribution asks what sort of just futures can be envisioned, if and when we remain focused on justifications that make gender and racial injustice invisible in the context of contract’s normative stakes. In particular, in this response, I offer a critique of the structural absence of intersectional feminist engagements with ideas of justice, democracy and freedom in discourse on justice and contract in Europe. The absence of feminist intersectional analyses undermines the diagnostic processes to identify root problems and the potential for radical reconsiderations for contract in Europe.


Lyn K.L. Tjon Soei Len
Lyn K.L. Tjon Soei Len is assistant professor at the Ohio State University.
Article

Access_open What is Normative Theory?

On Critique and the Normative Struggle Against Subjection

Keywords normative theory, critical theory, feminism, Foucault, critique as a practice of virtue
Authors Mirthe Jiwa
AbstractAuthor's information

    This contribution questions the conception of normative theory that Martijn Hesselink seems to embrace in Justifying Contract in Europe. The question it asks is ostensibly simple and straightforward: what is normative theory? And: what does Hesselink mean when he speaks of normative theory? By connecting the method and approach of Justifying Contract in Europe to the question of delimitation, the article raises several concerns with the reasons Hesselink offers for excluding feminist and Marxist theory, including their heterogeneity and presumed hostility to normative questions and approaches. The article suggests that these reasons point to a broader and more profound difficulty with Hesselink’s understanding of normative theory, which rests on a problematic distinction between normativity and critique. To this, the article responds that critique and normativity (moral philosophy), properly understood, are intimately related – in fact: inseparable – and that one without the other leaves us with a significantly impoverished and unduly narrow understanding of both normativity and critique.


Mirthe Jiwa
Mirthe Jiwa is lecturer of Private Law at the Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam and PhD candidate at the Amsterdam Centre of Transformative Private Law, University of Amsterdam.
Article

Access_open Reasoning Towards Utopia

A Reflection on M.W. Hesselink, Justifying Contract in Europe

Keywords normative theory, contract law, European integration, empirical legal studies, law and crisis
Authors Gareth Davies
AbstractAuthor's information

    In his book, Hesselink measures European Contract Law against the standards of several classical so-called normative political theories. This gives an idea of how European Contract Law fits within a certain intellectual landscape, but there are two things it does not do: it does not tell us how European Contract Law relates to some of the burning issues of the day, and it does not tell us what consequences European Contract Law would actually have. In a time of crisis, should we celebrate the cool cerebral quality of the book’s analysis, or be frustrated that it does not tell us what to do?


Gareth Davies
Gareth Davies is professor of EU Law at the Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
Article

Access_open Searching for Contract (Law) in Europe

Keywords contract, justice (labour), weaker party protection, mandatory contract law, European contract law
Authors Candida Leone
AbstractAuthor's information

    While investigating ways to Justifying Contract in Europe, Martijn Hesselink leaves it to the interrogated theories to define the scope of its very inquiry – the reach and significance of contract itself. This leaves the question of what Hesselink sets out to justify quite open for the reader, who at the same time gets the distinctive idea that this delimitation has normative significance in the author’s own views. To the extent that we do, as a matter of justice, need to have contract law rules – then, these rules need to be just. The comment, thus, seeks to re-articulate Hesselink’s non-definition of (European) contract law, to try to delimit where we need such rules and test the boundaries of what rules we may in fact accept or even need as a matter of justice – what kind of rules we can, in Hesselink’s framework, ultimately set out to justify.


Candida Leone
Candida Leone is assistant professor at the Amsterdam Centre for Transformative Private Law, University of Amsterdam.
Article

Access_open The Power of Reasons in European Private Law

Keywords contract law, justification, critical theory, political theory, European Union
Authors Martijn W. Hesselink
AbstractAuthor's information

    This article discusses the power of reasons in European private law. It does so in response to six articles written by critics, as part of a book symposium on Justifying Contract in Europe: Political Philosophies in European Contract Law (Oxford University Press, 2021). In particular, this contribution explores: the role of reasons in emancipatory political struggles; the meaning of reconciliation in pluralist societies; intersectional corrective justice through private law; the relationship between normative questions and critical theory; the priority of justice in times of crisis; and the politics of general private law theory.


Martijn W. Hesselink
Martijn W. Hesselink is professor of Transnational Law and Theory at the European University Institute (EUI).

Citation format

Would you like to cite a publication in the Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy? You could do this in the following way:

Christoph Kletzer, ‘Absolute Positivism’, NJLP 2013/2 p. 87-99