Crosscultural Communication in Language and Law, reply to Van Brakel

M. Loth

Issue 3 2006
Article In memoriam: Popke Wieger (Bob) Brouwer (1952-2006)
Editorial The Possibility of Intercultural Law
Article Legal Traditions and the Separation Thesis
Article Separation, Integration and Citizenship, reply to Glenn
Article The Necessity of Categories and the Inevitability of Separation, reply to Glenn
Article De-essentialising Across the Board. No Need to Speak the Same Language
Article Crosscultural Communication in Language and Law, reply to Van Brakel
Article Unlikely Candidates for Paradigmatic Cases of Intercultural Communication, reply to Van Brakel
Article The Legal and Moral Dimensions of Solidarity
Article Legal Cultures, Legal Traditions and Comparative Law
Article Sharia - A Flexible Notion
Article The Precision of Vagueness, interview with H. Patrick Glenn
Article Editorial afterthoughts: The Liberal-Fundamentalist Cookbook
Article Separation and Multivalence: Opposing or Compatible Notions?
Article Respecting Differences by Idealised Language

	Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy
Article	Crosscultural Communication in Language and Law, reply to Van Brakel
Keywords	identiteit, incest, leasing, amfetamine, binding, concern, E-business, identificatie, interest
Authors	M. Loth
	Show PDF Statistics Citation

This article has been viewed times.

This article been downloaded 0 times.

Suggested citation
M. Loth, "Crosscultural Communication in Language and Law, reply to Van Brakel", Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy, 3, (2006):

Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy

Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy

Crosscultural Communication in Language and Law, reply to Van Brakel

Dit artikel wordt geciteerd in

Citation format