This article discusses the right to strike, with special regard to Belgium. Referring to Walter Benjamin, Tindemans argues that strikes are rechtsetzend rather than rechtserhaltend; they constitute a legal order rather than preserve one. Strikes are exceptional phenomena within any legal system, as they do not fit normal criteria of legal validity. According to Tindemans, strikes are to be considered primarily as extralegal phenomena, as means in a political struggle, confronting the “police” of the core institutions of the state and the legal order. Strikes are political actions, moments of collective aspiration towards political equality, and as such threaten the “pureness” of the legal order in favour of a fragmented politics. |
Refine your search
Search result: 4 articles
Article |
|
Journal | Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy, Issue 3 2009 |
Keywords | law and politics, right to strike, exceptionalism, Benjamin, political action |
Authors | Dr. mr. Klaas Tindemans |
AbstractAuthor's information |
Book Review |
|
Journal | Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy, Issue 1 2008 |
Keywords | bemiddeling, delinquent, slachtoffer, strafrecht, identiteitsbewijs, strafvordering, verzoening, aansprakelijkheid, bemiddelaar, confrontatie |
Authors | K. Rozemond |
Article |
|
Journal | Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy, Issue 1 2005 |
Keywords | rechtsstaat, idee, motivering, rechtspraak, erkenning, werknemer, aansprakelijkheid, claim, kwaliteit, noodzakelijkheid |
Authors | M.A. Loth |
Article |
|
Journal | Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy, Issue 3 2005 |
Keywords | strafrecht, slachtoffer, delinquent, bemiddeling, gedetineerde, rechtspositie, aansprakelijkheid, strafvordering, grondrecht, bemiddelaar |
Authors | E. Claes |
Interface Showing Amount
You can search full text for articles by entering your search term in the search field. If you click the search button the search results will be shown on a fresh page where the search results can be narrowed down by category or year.